<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Confirms DRI&#039;s Authority as &quot;Proper Officer&quot; to Issue Show Cause Notice Under Customs Act Section 28(1.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62845</link>
    <description>Validity of SCN - Jurisdiction - Proper Officer or not - whether by virtue of the notifications dated 07.07.1997, 07.03.2002 and 06.07.2011, the DRI would have the authority to act under Section 28 of the Customs Act - The show cause notice under Section 28(1) could be issued by the “Proper Officer”. A “Proper Officer” is one, who is defined in Section 2(34) as the officer of Customs, either by the Board or by the Commissioner of Customs, who is assigned specific functions - the Respondent No.2 had the jurisdiction to issue impugned show cause notice. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2022 07:55:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2022 07:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Confirms DRI&#039;s Authority as &quot;Proper Officer&quot; to Issue Show Cause Notice Under Customs Act Section 28(1.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62845</link>
      <description>Validity of SCN - Jurisdiction - Proper Officer or not - whether by virtue of the notifications dated 07.07.1997, 07.03.2002 and 06.07.2011, the DRI would have the authority to act under Section 28 of the Customs Act - The show cause notice under Section 28(1) could be issued by the “Proper Officer”. A “Proper Officer” is one, who is defined in Section 2(34) as the officer of Customs, either by the Board or by the Commissioner of Customs, who is assigned specific functions - the Respondent No.2 had the jurisdiction to issue impugned show cause notice. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2022 07:55:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>