https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420752 Once execution of a pronote is proved by oral and documentary evidence, Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act raises a presumption that consideration existed. The defendant failed to rebut that presumption by effective evidence, including any expert challenge to the signature or convincing material on prior borrowals. The plea that the pronote lacked particulars did not displace the findings accepted by both courts below. In the absence of perversity or any substantial question of law, the limited jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC does not justify interference with concurrent findings of fact. en-us Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Apr 2022 07:54:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420752 Once execution of a pronote is proved by oral and documentary evidence, Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act raises a presumption that consideration existed. The defendant failed to rebut that presumption by effective evidence, including any expert challenge to the signature or convincing material on prior borrowals. The plea that the pronote lacked particulars did not displace the findings accepted by both courts below. In the absence of perversity or any substantial question of law, the limited jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC does not justify interference with concurrent findings of fact. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420752