https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301571 The court allowed the miscellaneous application for early hearing and set aside the impugned communication regarding the security deposit for provisional release of seized goods. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, emphasizing fairness and proper consideration of the deposited amount. The appeal challenging the terms of provisional release was disposed of in favor of the applicant, highlighting the importance of factual submissions and ensuring the security deposit requirement aligns with the deposited amount. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Apr 2022 07:54:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301571 The court allowed the miscellaneous application for early hearing and set aside the impugned communication regarding the security deposit for provisional release of seized goods. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration, emphasizing fairness and proper consideration of the deposited amount. The appeal challenging the terms of provisional release was disposed of in favor of the applicant, highlighting the importance of factual submissions and ensuring the security deposit requirement aligns with the deposited amount. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301571