<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1409 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee on all issues, including the treatment of expenditures as revenue expenses rather than capital expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that the expenditures were necessary for the smooth operation of the business and did not result in new assets of enduring nature. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:01:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1409 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions in favor of the assessee on all issues, including the treatment of expenditures as revenue expenses rather than capital expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that the expenditures were necessary for the smooth operation of the business and did not result in new assets of enduring nature. The revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>