<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1290 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301567</link>
    <description>Successive bail applications are maintainable only on a material change in facts or law directly affecting the earlier refusal; mere repetition of prior grounds is insufficient. An inconclusive DNA profiling report received later did not amount to a substantial change, and prima facie materials from witness statements, motive, and the seriousness of the accusations continued to weigh against release. The court reiterated that detailed appraisal of evidence is inappropriate at the bail stage, while gravity of offence, risk of absconding, and possible tampering with evidence remain relevant considerations. Bail was therefore not granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:01:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1290 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301567</link>
      <description>Successive bail applications are maintainable only on a material change in facts or law directly affecting the earlier refusal; mere repetition of prior grounds is insufficient. An inconclusive DNA profiling report received later did not amount to a substantial change, and prima facie materials from witness statements, motive, and the seriousness of the accusations continued to weigh against release. The court reiterated that detailed appraisal of evidence is inappropriate at the bail stage, while gravity of offence, risk of absconding, and possible tampering with evidence remain relevant considerations. Bail was therefore not granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>