https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420745 The HC granted bail to the applicant who had been in custody since 10.09.2021 for alleged offenses under Sections 132(1)(b), (c), and (i) of CGST Act, 2017. The Court considered that the self-incriminating statement was potentially obtained under duress, the applicant had closed the offending firms, exercised right of appeal, had no criminal history, and deserved parity with co-accused already granted bail. The bail was granted with conditions including furnishing personal bond with sureties, non-tampering with evidence, non-influencing witnesses, and regular court appearances. en-us Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 15:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420745 The HC granted bail to the applicant who had been in custody since 10.09.2021 for alleged offenses under Sections 132(1)(b), (c), and (i) of CGST Act, 2017. The Court considered that the self-incriminating statement was potentially obtained under duress, the applicant had closed the offending firms, exercised right of appeal, had no criminal history, and deserved parity with co-accused already granted bail. The bail was granted with conditions including furnishing personal bond with sureties, non-tampering with evidence, non-influencing witnesses, and regular court appearances. Case-Laws GST Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420745