<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 393 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, restoring the original assessment order as it found the basis for invoking Section 263 to be misconceived. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to allow expenses for interest on unsecured loans, brokerage charges, and processing charges, considering the nature of the assessee&#039;s business. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Principal Commissioner&#039;s view on the trading loss claim, emphasizing the legitimacy of the non-delivery-based trading transactions. Consequently, both appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the original assessment orders were reinstated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 08:03:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 393 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, restoring the original assessment order as it found the basis for invoking Section 263 to be misconceived. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision to allow expenses for interest on unsecured loans, brokerage charges, and processing charges, considering the nature of the assessee&#039;s business. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the Principal Commissioner&#039;s view on the trading loss claim, emphasizing the legitimacy of the non-delivery-based trading transactions. Consequently, both appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the original assessment orders were reinstated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>