<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 377 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the remand order issued by the Commissioner (Appeals), as the adjudicating authority had already conducted de novo adjudication in accordance with the specific directions. The appeal was deemed moot since the matter had been reserved for orders following the reexamination, rendering the appeal infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 08:03:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 377 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal against the remand order issued by the Commissioner (Appeals), as the adjudicating authority had already conducted de novo adjudication in accordance with the specific directions. The appeal was deemed moot since the matter had been reserved for orders following the reexamination, rendering the appeal infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>