<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28547</link>
    <description>Where a family partition and division of capital account in partnership interests had already been recognised in final wealth-tax proceedings, the minors&#039; attributable share in those partnership interests could not be brought to tax in the father&#039;s hands merely because he had received the partnership income in full. The Madras HC treated the earlier findings as final and held that only the father&#039;s own share income was assessable in his assessments; the minors&#039; share income was not includible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:34:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 11 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28547</link>
      <description>Where a family partition and division of capital account in partnership interests had already been recognised in final wealth-tax proceedings, the minors&#039; attributable share in those partnership interests could not be brought to tax in the father&#039;s hands merely because he had received the partnership income in full. The Madras HC treated the earlier findings as final and held that only the father&#039;s own share income was assessable in his assessments; the minors&#039; share income was not includible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>