<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 354 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420688</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the assessment of profit as capital gains instead of business income. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the assessee&#039;s age and lack of education, with no objections from the Senior DR. The Tribunal considered the intention behind property purchase for profit determination, emphasizing the absence of trading intent in the property transactions. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal reversed the lower authorities&#039; decision and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2022 08:01:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 354 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420688</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the assessment of profit as capital gains instead of business income. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to the assessee&#039;s age and lack of education, with no objections from the Senior DR. The Tribunal considered the intention behind property purchase for profit determination, emphasizing the absence of trading intent in the property transactions. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal reversed the lower authorities&#039; decision and ruled in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>