<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1642 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301527</link>
    <description>The appellant was granted Cenvat Credit for Air &amp;amp; Rail Travel Agent Service and Courier Service as the Member (Judicial) found that previous judgments had established the admissibility of such credit in relation to the manufacture and clearance of goods. Despite the absence of representation from the appellant, the Member allowed the appeal and modified the impugned order, setting a precedent affirming the admissibility of Cenvat Credit for these services.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:14:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1642 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301527</link>
      <description>The appellant was granted Cenvat Credit for Air &amp;amp; Rail Travel Agent Service and Courier Service as the Member (Judicial) found that previous judgments had established the admissibility of such credit in relation to the manufacture and clearance of goods. Despite the absence of representation from the appellant, the Member allowed the appeal and modified the impugned order, setting a precedent affirming the admissibility of Cenvat Credit for these services.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>