https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301526 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat Credit for Courier Service. The Tribunal emphasized that the admissibility of the credit was based on the usage of Courier Service in manufacturing and goods removal, rather than the return of goods to the factory. The impugned order denying the credit was set aside, affirming the appellant's entitlement to Cenvat Credit for Courier Service. en-us Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:14:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301526 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to Cenvat Credit for Courier Service. The Tribunal emphasized that the admissibility of the credit was based on the usage of Courier Service in manufacturing and goods removal, rather than the return of goods to the factory. The impugned order denying the credit was set aside, affirming the appellant's entitlement to Cenvat Credit for Courier Service. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301526