<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1980 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301533</link>
    <description>A preventive detention order is invalid where the detaining authority has actively ated in the sponsoring process, because subjective satisfaction must be formed independently and with an open mind on the materials placed before it. If the authority takes part in the sponsorship exercise or attests the sponsoring affidavit, that prior involvement indicates pre-determination and vitiates the detention. The Madras HC held that such participation goes to the root of the order and set aside the detention order on that ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:14:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1980 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301533</link>
      <description>A preventive detention order is invalid where the detaining authority has actively ated in the sponsoring process, because subjective satisfaction must be formed independently and with an open mind on the materials placed before it. If the authority takes part in the sponsorship exercise or attests the sponsoring affidavit, that prior involvement indicates pre-determination and vitiates the detention. The Madras HC held that such participation goes to the root of the order and set aside the detention order on that ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>