https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301545 The High Court found errors in the form for re-opening of assessment unacceptable, noting Mr. Saurabh Yadav's lack of personal involvement. The court emphasized the need for direct explanations from officers involved, specifically naming Mr. Trilochan Singh Khalsa, Mr. Ashok Pophare, and Ms. Irina Garg. Mr. Yadav's affidavit attributing errors to bonafide mistakes was deemed unsatisfactory. The court directed the officers to explain the approval despite errors due to the significant alleged escaped income. A correction was made in the order dated 21st December, 2021, with the case adjourned to 28th February, 2022. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Apr 2022 20:14:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301545 The High Court found errors in the form for re-opening of assessment unacceptable, noting Mr. Saurabh Yadav's lack of personal involvement. The court emphasized the need for direct explanations from officers involved, specifically naming Mr. Trilochan Singh Khalsa, Mr. Ashok Pophare, and Ms. Irina Garg. Mr. Yadav's affidavit attributing errors to bonafide mistakes was deemed unsatisfactory. The court directed the officers to explain the approval despite errors due to the significant alleged escaped income. A correction was made in the order dated 21st December, 2021, with the case adjourned to 28th February, 2022. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301545