<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 348 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420682</link>
    <description>Bail was granted in a pending criminal case after the Court noted that the petitioner had been in custody for a substantial period, custodial interrogation had already been completed, and the prosecution was holding the material collected during investigation. On those facts, the Court found continued custody unnecessary and allowed release subject to conditions, including execution of a personal bond, sureties, and cooperation with the investigating agency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 348 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420682</link>
      <description>Bail was granted in a pending criminal case after the Court noted that the petitioner had been in custody for a substantial period, custodial interrogation had already been completed, and the prosecution was holding the material collected during investigation. On those facts, the Court found continued custody unnecessary and allowed release subject to conditions, including execution of a personal bond, sureties, and cooperation with the investigating agency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>