<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 328 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary proceedings under Section 263, holding that the AO had conducted adequate inquiries and the PCIT had not conducted any independent inquiry to substantiate the claim that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:00:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 328 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary proceedings under Section 263, holding that the AO had conducted adequate inquiries and the PCIT had not conducted any independent inquiry to substantiate the claim that the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>