<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 325 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by directing the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 116,244 for delayed ESI and PF contributions. It held that the amendments by the Finance Act, 2021, were prospective and not retrospective, applying from the assessment year 2021-22. The Tribunal emphasized that the payments were made within the timeline specified under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:00:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 325 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee by directing the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 116,244 for delayed ESI and PF contributions. It held that the amendments by the Finance Act, 2021, were prospective and not retrospective, applying from the assessment year 2021-22. The Tribunal emphasized that the payments were made within the timeline specified under Section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act, ultimately allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>