<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 307 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420641</link>
    <description>The amended definition of telecommunication service continued to exclude services provided in relation to internet telecommunication, and the shift in wording from &quot;subscriber&quot; to &quot;person&quot; did not remove that exclusion. On that basis, internet-linked leased circuit service remained outside taxability after 01.06.2007. As no mistake apparent from the record was shown, rectification of the final order was not warranted and the miscellaneous application failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:00:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 307 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420641</link>
      <description>The amended definition of telecommunication service continued to exclude services provided in relation to internet telecommunication, and the shift in wording from &quot;subscriber&quot; to &quot;person&quot; did not remove that exclusion. On that basis, internet-linked leased circuit service remained outside taxability after 01.06.2007. As no mistake apparent from the record was shown, rectification of the final order was not warranted and the miscellaneous application failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>