<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 306 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the advocate&#039;s argument that the Revenue cannot dispute eligibility when a refund of input service credit is claimed. The denial of refund was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed with any consequential relief. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly on 31/03/2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 306 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal, upholding the advocate&#039;s argument that the Revenue cannot dispute eligibility when a refund of input service credit is claimed. The denial of refund was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed with any consequential relief. Both appeals were disposed of accordingly on 31/03/2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>