<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1887 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was not applicable in this case as the additions were based on estimations. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that it was not a fit case for the levy of penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 22:01:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1887 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was not applicable in this case as the additions were based on estimations. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that it was not a fit case for the levy of penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>