<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1666 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301495</link>
    <description>The ITAT directed the AO to tax alleged bogus purchases at a rate of 5%, disagreeing with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the addition at 12.5%. The ITAT considered the nature of the business and applicable VAT rate, concluding that only the profit element should be taxed, resulting in the allowance of the appeals in all four cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 22:01:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1666 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301495</link>
      <description>The ITAT directed the AO to tax alleged bogus purchases at a rate of 5%, disagreeing with the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to sustain the addition at 12.5%. The ITAT considered the nature of the business and applicable VAT rate, concluding that only the profit element should be taxed, resulting in the allowance of the appeals in all four cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>