<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28529</link>
    <description>The court ruled against the assessee, denying relief under Section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the comprehensive provisions of Section 44 for computing profits of insurance companies. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing a deduction under Section 37 for a payment made to the provident fund due to devaluation of the Indian rupee. The court concluded with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 10 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28529</link>
      <description>The court ruled against the assessee, denying relief under Section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the comprehensive provisions of Section 44 for computing profits of insurance companies. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing a deduction under Section 37 for a payment made to the provident fund due to devaluation of the Indian rupee. The court concluded with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>