<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 298 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420632</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court noted significant delays in the disposal of pending applications by the Adjudicating Authority despite expedite orders. An application requesting the decision of counter claims before adjudication on pending applications was found incompatible with legal requirements. The Court expressed disappointment in the Authority&#039;s failure to adhere to specific orders, emphasizing compliance with directives. An appeal challenging an order of the Appellate Tribunal was restored for further action. An application seeking enforcement of an order was deemed unnecessary and dismissed, leaving the matter open for consideration by the Appellate Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 21:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 298 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420632</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court noted significant delays in the disposal of pending applications by the Adjudicating Authority despite expedite orders. An application requesting the decision of counter claims before adjudication on pending applications was found incompatible with legal requirements. The Court expressed disappointment in the Authority&#039;s failure to adhere to specific orders, emphasizing compliance with directives. An appeal challenging an order of the Appellate Tribunal was restored for further action. An application seeking enforcement of an order was deemed unnecessary and dismissed, leaving the matter open for consideration by the Appellate Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>