<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 295 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420629</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment, provided proper reasons, and eventually supplied the required sanction/approval under Section 151. The court found that there was tangible material for reopening the assessment, and the approval/sanction document was deemed authenticated as per Section 282-A of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 295 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420629</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment, provided proper reasons, and eventually supplied the required sanction/approval under Section 151. The court found that there was tangible material for reopening the assessment, and the approval/sanction document was deemed authenticated as per Section 282-A of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>