<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 290 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT-I&#039;s order under Section 263, directing the Assessing Officer to disallow the interest paid of Rs. 2,85,632/- under Section 40(a)(ia) and the claim of deduction under Section 54EC for the STDR with SBI. The Tribunal held that the original assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue due to inadequate examination by the A.O. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on April 1, 2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 09:09:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 290 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT-I&#039;s order under Section 263, directing the Assessing Officer to disallow the interest paid of Rs. 2,85,632/- under Section 40(a)(ia) and the claim of deduction under Section 54EC for the STDR with SBI. The Tribunal held that the original assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue due to inadequate examination by the A.O. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the order was pronounced on April 1, 2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>