<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 287 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the assessing officer&#039;s order was not erroneous, and quashed the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and a Co-ordinate Bench&#039;s decision to support the eligibility of interest income from a Co-operative Bank for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The appeal was successful, and the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order disallowing the deduction was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 09:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 287 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the assessing officer&#039;s order was not erroneous, and quashed the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents and a Co-ordinate Bench&#039;s decision to support the eligibility of interest income from a Co-operative Bank for deduction under section 80P(2)(d). The appeal was successful, and the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order disallowing the deduction was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>