<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 271 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420605</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioners to pay 50% of customs duty in cash and provide a bank guarantee for the remaining 50% for the seized gold bangles purchased during their visit to India for a family wedding. Upon compliance, the gold bangles would be released. The respondents were instructed to conclude adjudication proceedings within six months, with petitioners&#039; cooperation mandated. No costs were imposed, and related Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 271 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420605</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioners to pay 50% of customs duty in cash and provide a bank guarantee for the remaining 50% for the seized gold bangles purchased during their visit to India for a family wedding. Upon compliance, the gold bangles would be released. The respondents were instructed to conclude adjudication proceedings within six months, with petitioners&#039; cooperation mandated. No costs were imposed, and related Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>