<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 264 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420598</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissed multiple Interlocutory Applications (I.A.s) following the approval of a Resolution Plan, leading to appeals by M/s R.S Wire Industries being dismissed. The NCLT upheld the binding nature of the approved Resolution Plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, extinguishing claims not included in the plan. The Tribunal found no merit in the appeals, affirming the dismissal of the I.A.s and emphasizing the importance of the approved Resolution Plan. The appeals were dismissed, and the Impugned Order was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 15:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 264 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420598</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) dismissed multiple Interlocutory Applications (I.A.s) following the approval of a Resolution Plan, leading to appeals by M/s R.S Wire Industries being dismissed. The NCLT upheld the binding nature of the approved Resolution Plan under Section 31 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, extinguishing claims not included in the plan. The Tribunal found no merit in the appeals, affirming the dismissal of the I.A.s and emphasizing the importance of the approved Resolution Plan. The appeals were dismissed, and the Impugned Order was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>