<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 262 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420596</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the order admitting the application under Section 7 of the IBC and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional was dismissed as infructuous. The CoC&#039;s decision for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, based on the rejection of the only Resolution Plan, was upheld by the Tribunal. The CIRP was deemed unsuccessful, leading to the validation of the liquidation recommendation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2022 09:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 262 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420596</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the order admitting the application under Section 7 of the IBC and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional was dismissed as infructuous. The CoC&#039;s decision for liquidation of the Corporate Debtor, based on the rejection of the only Resolution Plan, was upheld by the Tribunal. The CIRP was deemed unsuccessful, leading to the validation of the liquidation recommendation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>