https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420581 Bail under Section 439 CrPC was found appropriate where the accused had remained in custody for a considerable period, the charge had not been framed, and the trial had stalled because of interim orders in connected proceedings. The court also noted that co-accused, including the alleged kingpin, had already been granted bail and there was no material showing involvement in any other criminal case. On these facts, continued detention was considered unnecessary and unlikely to serve any useful purpose pending trial, so bail was granted. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 17:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420581 Bail under Section 439 CrPC was found appropriate where the accused had remained in custody for a considerable period, the charge had not been framed, and the trial had stalled because of interim orders in connected proceedings. The court also noted that co-accused, including the alleged kingpin, had already been granted bail and there was no material showing involvement in any other criminal case. On these facts, continued detention was considered unnecessary and unlikely to serve any useful purpose pending trial, so bail was granted. Case-Laws GST Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420581