<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 246 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420580</link>
    <description>The court held that prosecution against directors without the company being accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is not maintainable. The court emphasized the need for specific averments on directors&#039; roles and the company&#039;s arraignment for vicarious liability. The petitions were allowed, quashing criminal proceedings against the directors due to insufficient allegations and failure to follow legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 246 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420580</link>
      <description>The court held that prosecution against directors without the company being accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is not maintainable. The court emphasized the need for specific averments on directors&#039; roles and the company&#039;s arraignment for vicarious liability. The petitions were allowed, quashing criminal proceedings against the directors due to insufficient allegations and failure to follow legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>