<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1943 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301473</link>
    <description>The customs authorities&#039; appeal was dismissed, allowing the respondent to retrieve the seized gold items upon depositing 50% of the duty. Despite the return of the items, legal actions under the Customs Act could still be pursued against the respondent. The court stressed the significance of adherence to due process and legal protocols in customs enforcement cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 21:46:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1943 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301473</link>
      <description>The customs authorities&#039; appeal was dismissed, allowing the respondent to retrieve the seized gold items upon depositing 50% of the duty. Despite the return of the items, legal actions under the Customs Act could still be pursued against the respondent. The court stressed the significance of adherence to due process and legal protocols in customs enforcement cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>