<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1043 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 11,44,759. Contributions to PF and ESI made before the due date of filing the return of income under Section 139(1) were held not to be disallowed, despite being made after the due dates prescribed under the respective statutes. The Tribunal relied on precedents and concluded that the disallowance by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 21:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1043 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 11,44,759. Contributions to PF and ESI made before the due date of filing the return of income under Section 139(1) were held not to be disallowed, despite being made after the due dates prescribed under the respective statutes. The Tribunal relied on precedents and concluded that the disallowance by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A) was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>