<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 10 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28513</link>
    <description>Relief under the incentive provisions was available where the fourth kiln constituted a genuinely expanded undertaking with fresh capital, additional plant and machinery, increased production capacity and a separate identity, bringing it within the tests applied to sections 84 and 80J. Contributions to the Cement Allocation and Co-ordinating Organisation were deductible as business expenditure because they were incurred under a government-linked decontrol scheme and were commercially expedient. An amount retained towards liability to the State Trading Corporation was treated as only a contingent liability, not an ascertained liability accrued in the relevant year, and was therefore not deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:25:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 10 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28513</link>
      <description>Relief under the incentive provisions was available where the fourth kiln constituted a genuinely expanded undertaking with fresh capital, additional plant and machinery, increased production capacity and a separate identity, bringing it within the tests applied to sections 84 and 80J. Contributions to the Cement Allocation and Co-ordinating Organisation were deductible as business expenditure because they were incurred under a government-linked decontrol scheme and were commercially expedient. An amount retained towards liability to the State Trading Corporation was treated as only a contingent liability, not an ascertained liability accrued in the relevant year, and was therefore not deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>