<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 235 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the restriction of the addition related to on money receipts in the first issue but reversed the addition concerning the rate difference between the developer and landowners in the second issue due to insufficient evidence. The appeal was partially allowed, granting relief to the appellant on the second issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 09:09:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 235 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the restriction of the addition related to on money receipts in the first issue but reversed the addition concerning the rate difference between the developer and landowners in the second issue due to insufficient evidence. The appeal was partially allowed, granting relief to the appellant on the second issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>