<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 234 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, finding the jurisdiction assumption based on incorrect facts. It was held that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate inquiries during the assessment proceedings. The appeal was allowed, and the assessment order passed by the AO was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 234 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263, finding the jurisdiction assumption based on incorrect facts. It was held that the Assessing Officer had conducted adequate inquiries during the assessment proceedings. The appeal was allowed, and the assessment order passed by the AO was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>