<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 231 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments for the years 2004-05 and 2005-06 as the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction under Section 153C, given the absence of incriminating material belonging to the assessee during the search. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the additions made by the AO, ultimately annulling the assessments for both years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 09:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 231 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessments for the years 2004-05 and 2005-06 as the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction under Section 153C, given the absence of incriminating material belonging to the assessee during the search. The Tribunal did not delve into the merits of the additions made by the AO, ultimately annulling the assessments for both years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>