https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420552 The court directed the respondent to retest the goods in line with Customs Circular No.30/2017 and the applicant's request. The vessel was seized due to discrepancies in goods declaration and testing results. The court emphasized compliance with the retesting order and gave a final opportunity for retesting. The foreign flag vessel was provisionally released with a Bond requirement. The dispute centered on determining whether the goods were GTL Light Paraffin or Light Diesel Oil, with the court stressing the importance of accurate testing. The court instructed prompt retesting by CRCL, Delhi, to ascertain the product's nature. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Apr 2022 09:08:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420552 The court directed the respondent to retest the goods in line with Customs Circular No.30/2017 and the applicant's request. The vessel was seized due to discrepancies in goods declaration and testing results. The court emphasized compliance with the retesting order and gave a final opportunity for retesting. The foreign flag vessel was provisionally released with a Bond requirement. The dispute centered on determining whether the goods were GTL Light Paraffin or Light Diesel Oil, with the court stressing the importance of accurate testing. The court instructed prompt retesting by CRCL, Delhi, to ascertain the product's nature. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420552