<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 206 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420540</link>
    <description>An investment made in a real estate joint development arrangement by a party acting as promoter and investor does not amount to financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, where the transaction is structured as a joint venture rather than a borrowing against the time value of money. The memorandum of understanding and joint venture agreement showed a promoter/landowner and developer relationship, not an allottee relationship. The deeming provision treating amounts raised from an allottee as having the commercial effect of borrowing was inapplicable because the investor could not be treated as an allottee under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 09:07:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 206 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420540</link>
      <description>An investment made in a real estate joint development arrangement by a party acting as promoter and investor does not amount to financial debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, where the transaction is structured as a joint venture rather than a borrowing against the time value of money. The memorandum of understanding and joint venture agreement showed a promoter/landowner and developer relationship, not an allottee relationship. The deeming provision treating amounts raised from an allottee as having the commercial effect of borrowing was inapplicable because the investor could not be treated as an allottee under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>