https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420539 An insolvency-related application was treated as maintainable despite an earlier pending interlocutory request, because the earlier matter had not been finally decided and the later filing reflected the change from CIRP to liquidation. The sub-lease agreements were described as validly terminated before admission of the insolvency case, and later conduct, including part allotment of the land to a third party, supported that position; partial rent acceptance did not amount to waiver or revive the leases. The Tribunal's jurisdiction under section 60(5) was described as wide but limited, extending to protection during moratorium but not to restoring terminated lease rights or granting substantive renewal relief. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Apr 2022 21:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420539 An insolvency-related application was treated as maintainable despite an earlier pending interlocutory request, because the earlier matter had not been finally decided and the later filing reflected the change from CIRP to liquidation. The sub-lease agreements were described as validly terminated before admission of the insolvency case, and later conduct, including part allotment of the land to a third party, supported that position; partial rent acceptance did not amount to waiver or revive the leases. The Tribunal's jurisdiction under section 60(5) was described as wide but limited, extending to protection during moratorium but not to restoring terminated lease rights or granting substantive renewal relief. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 23 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420539