<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 203 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420537</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, acknowledging the lack of a personal hearing and the ex parte nature of the order-in-original. The court raised concerns about email communication and directed the respondent to clarify their position regarding the pending appeals before CESTAT. The case is scheduled for the next hearing to address the outstanding issues and decide on the appropriate steps moving forward.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 09:07:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 203 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420537</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the petitioner, acknowledging the lack of a personal hearing and the ex parte nature of the order-in-original. The court raised concerns about email communication and directed the respondent to clarify their position regarding the pending appeals before CESTAT. The case is scheduled for the next hearing to address the outstanding issues and decide on the appropriate steps moving forward.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>