https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420529 The revisional court, acting under the Orissa amendment to Section 115 CPC, could allow an Order VII Rule 11 application and reject the plaint because such rejection finally disposes of the suit at the threshold. The plaint did disclose a dispute arising from the memorandum of understanding and the cheque, but the declaratory reliefs were, in substance, aimed at preventing action on dishonour of the cheque and were barred by law under the Specific Relief Act and the Negotiable Instruments Act. The absence of consequential reliefs also supported rejection. The High Court's contrary view was set aside and the order rejecting the plaint was restored. en-us Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Sep 2025 12:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420529 The revisional court, acting under the Orissa amendment to Section 115 CPC, could allow an Order VII Rule 11 application and reject the plaint because such rejection finally disposes of the suit at the threshold. The plaint did disclose a dispute arising from the memorandum of understanding and the cheque, but the declaratory reliefs were, in substance, aimed at preventing action on dishonour of the cheque and were barred by law under the Specific Relief Act and the Negotiable Instruments Act. The absence of consequential reliefs also supported rejection. The High Court's contrary view was set aside and the order rejecting the plaint was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420529