<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1286 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301455</link>
    <description>The High Court referred the jurisdictional dispute regarding the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s authority to entertain an avoidance application post-approval of a resolution plan in Empee Distilleries Limited&#039;s insolvency proceedings back to the NCLT for resolution. The Court emphasized the specialized nature of insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and directed the NCLT to expedite the disposal of the avoidance application within eight weeks. The parties were instructed to present their arguments before the NCLT, and the petitioner was given a week to file its counter-affidavit. No costs were awarded, and related interim applications were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:58:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675019" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1286 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301455</link>
      <description>The High Court referred the jurisdictional dispute regarding the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s authority to entertain an avoidance application post-approval of a resolution plan in Empee Distilleries Limited&#039;s insolvency proceedings back to the NCLT for resolution. The Court emphasized the specialized nature of insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and directed the NCLT to expedite the disposal of the avoidance application within eight weeks. The parties were instructed to present their arguments before the NCLT, and the petitioner was given a week to file its counter-affidavit. No costs were awarded, and related interim applications were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>