<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1600 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301432</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the computation of capital gains based on the actual sale consideration of Rs. 55,00,000 for the transfer of leasehold rights. It held that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act does not apply to leasehold rights transactions, citing various precedents. The lower authorities were instructed to calculate capital gains accordingly, rejecting the use of stamp valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1600 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301432</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the computation of capital gains based on the actual sale consideration of Rs. 55,00,000 for the transfer of leasehold rights. It held that Section 50C of the Income Tax Act does not apply to leasehold rights transactions, citing various precedents. The lower authorities were instructed to calculate capital gains accordingly, rejecting the use of stamp valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>