<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2117 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301445</link>
    <description>The writ petition challenged conditions imposed for provisional release of goods, but the HC declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction. The Court disposed of the petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal against the impugned order. The operative effect is that the dispute over the release conditions was left to the appellate remedy rather than being decided in the writ proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:58:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675007" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2117 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301445</link>
      <description>The writ petition challenged conditions imposed for provisional release of goods, but the HC declined to examine the merits in writ jurisdiction. The Court disposed of the petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal against the impugned order. The operative effect is that the dispute over the release conditions was left to the appellate remedy rather than being decided in the writ proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>