<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1788 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301451</link>
    <description>Section 93 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 permits an appeal not only against assessment but also against the levy of tax itself. On that construction, the appellate authority may examine both the legality of the property tax levy and the appellant&#039;s claim to exemption from property tax. The availability of the statutory appeal therefore does not bar consideration of substantive objections on merits, and all available contentions may be urged before the appellate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 20:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=675001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1788 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301451</link>
      <description>Section 93 of the Cantonments Act, 2006 permits an appeal not only against assessment but also against the levy of tax itself. On that construction, the appellate authority may examine both the legality of the property tax levy and the appellant&#039;s claim to exemption from property tax. The availability of the statutory appeal therefore does not bar consideration of substantive objections on merits, and all available contentions may be urged before the appellate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>