https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301453 Interference with an acquittal is justified where the trial court's view is perverse or demonstrably unsustainable; applying that standard, the later dying declaration was found consistent with medical and surrounding evidence, while the accidental-fire version was unsupported, so the conviction was upheld. An intentional act of pouring kerosene on the victim and setting her ablaze was treated as imminently dangerous and falling within clause fourthly of Section 300 IPC, and a later attempt to extinguish the fire did not change the legal character of the act; the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC was sustained. en-us Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301453 Interference with an acquittal is justified where the trial court's view is perverse or demonstrably unsustainable; applying that standard, the later dying declaration was found consistent with medical and surrounding evidence, while the accidental-fire version was unsupported, so the conviction was upheld. An intentional act of pouring kerosene on the victim and setting her ablaze was treated as imminently dangerous and falling within clause fourthly of Section 300 IPC, and a later attempt to extinguish the fire did not change the legal character of the act; the murder conviction under Section 302 IPC was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301453