https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301425 The Judicial Commissioner and Assistant Judicial Commissioner dismissed the appeal in favor of the plaintiff, upholding her ownership claim to the village in Oudh named Para Kuru. The court emphasized the binding nature of the decree obtained by Masih in 1885, rejecting the defendant's challenge to set aside the sale to Moti. The District Judge's application of the Limitation Act was found erroneous, resulting in a ruling in favor of the plaintiff, who was awarded costs by the court. en-us Sat, 03 Jul 1897 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 04 Apr 2022 16:44:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301425 The Judicial Commissioner and Assistant Judicial Commissioner dismissed the appeal in favor of the plaintiff, upholding her ownership claim to the village in Oudh named Para Kuru. The court emphasized the binding nature of the decree obtained by Masih in 1885, rejecting the defendant's challenge to set aside the sale to Moti. The District Judge's application of the Limitation Act was found erroneous, resulting in a ruling in favor of the plaintiff, who was awarded costs by the court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 03 Jul 1897 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301425