<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 186 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420520</link>
    <description>The MP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging tax proceedings on grounds of natural justice violation. The petitioner claimed denial of effective hearing opportunity due to non-supply of demanded documents/data during adjudication. The court held that while relied documents were provided with the show cause notice, the petitioner&#039;s repeated demands for entire laptop data appeared dilatory rather than for effective defense. The court noted the petitioner failed to appear through legal representation and emphasized that appellate authority could examine non-supply issues. The petition was dismissed as alternative appellate remedy was available for raising these grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 186 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420520</link>
      <description>The MP HC dismissed a writ petition challenging tax proceedings on grounds of natural justice violation. The petitioner claimed denial of effective hearing opportunity due to non-supply of demanded documents/data during adjudication. The court held that while relied documents were provided with the show cause notice, the petitioner&#039;s repeated demands for entire laptop data appeared dilatory rather than for effective defense. The court noted the petitioner failed to appear through legal representation and emphasized that appellate authority could examine non-supply issues. The petition was dismissed as alternative appellate remedy was available for raising these grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>