<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (4) TMI 143 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420477</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of cross-examination of witnesses and officers, ruling that the appellant failed to establish the necessity of cross-examination. The appellant was accused of duty evasion through mis-declaration and undervaluation of imported goods, leading to re-determination of declared value, differential customs duty, and penalties. Despite citing violations of natural justice principles, including the right to cross-examination, the Tribunal found the denial justified based on evidence from physical examinations and admissions by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, and the original order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:13:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=674903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (4) TMI 143 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420477</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of cross-examination of witnesses and officers, ruling that the appellant failed to establish the necessity of cross-examination. The appellant was accused of duty evasion through mis-declaration and undervaluation of imported goods, leading to re-determination of declared value, differential customs duty, and penalties. Despite citing violations of natural justice principles, including the right to cross-examination, the Tribunal found the denial justified based on evidence from physical examinations and admissions by the appellant. The appeal was dismissed, and the original order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=420477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>